New Delhi:
Harshit rana: Substitute player Harshit Rana Did Magic played a very important role in the fourth T20 against England against England in Pune on Friday to give Team India a 3-1 lead in the series 3-1 in the series, But after India’s victory, this matter has started catching up. Certainly this issue will reach the ICC. On feeding Harshit in XI, England captain Jos Buttler and former cricket Kevin Pietersen were unhappy, while Akash Chopra has also questioned this decision.
Due to this, there is noise on joy
In fact, according to the rules of ICC, “Like-for-Like) player can be included in the team after a player’s conversion (head injury). But the same thing is not embracing all the veterans. Akash Chopra, including captain Butler, also believes that Harshit Rana is not the “Like-after Like” of Shivam Dube, who became the player of the match.
The resentment of the British is justified!
You think it is such that where Shivam Dubey is a batting-all-rounder, Harshit Rana, who played an important role in India’s victory by taking three wickets, is an all-rounder. Meaning, if Dubey landed on the field in the event of getting fit, then it is not clear whether he does not do the whole quota or not. However, the important thing above this is that Shivam Dubey is not a better bowler than Harshit Rana. Harshit Rana even threw a ball at a speed of 150 km/h on Friday. Obviously, these two are not “like-for-lick”. In such a situation, the question of Akash Chopra is also completely correct and the resentment of the British. Now it will be a matter of seeing how ICC takes this incident further.
Former England veterans raised questions
Michael Vaughan wrote on X, “How can a bowler replace the batsman who bowls parttime”