
New Delhi:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6YV9ichht8
Harshit Rana Controversy: On Friday, Team Suryakumar Yadav (Suryakumar Yadav) defeated the guest England by 15 runs in the fourth T20 in Pune to take an unbeatable lead in the five -match series. Now Sunday’s match will approve how much India series wins, but on the other hand, the discussion of India’s victory has completely moved away and Harshit Rana ( Harshit rana) The dispute has shifted. And in fact this dispute is not taking the name of stopping. The statements of veterans, especially former England cricketers, are coming, while the ICC has kept silence on the incident. These former cricketer Harshit Rana is raising questions about feeding Rana in the XI under the rule after a convention (not a serious head injury) during the match. And of course it is a echo that the ICC will have to listen to because if this incident had happened in the World Cup final or semi -finals, or if there was a big match in the future, there will be a big ruckus. All the people are keeping their side in the Harshit Rana controversy, but no one dared to speak, who is the mistake in the case. We say who is actually guilty here. Let us know about the rule before proceeding.
Also read:
IND vs Eng: “This is absolutely madness …” Alastair Cook made a big statement on Harshit Rana’s play in place of Dubey, reaction created sensation
Ind vs Eng 4th T20I: Due to this, there was a ruckus on feeding Harshit Rana, veterans including Chopra raised questions
Replacement rules of ICC on conversion
According to Rule 1.2.7.3 of Convention Replacement under ICC’s playing condition, “ICC match referee should usually approve a convention replacement request. Under this, the referee should be given the same player (like-to like) as a replacement to the player. .
At the same time, Rule 1.2.7.7 states: “The decision of ICC match referee regarding any convention replacement request will be final and no team will have any right to appeal.”
The screw is stuck here, the question arises here?
It is true that the appeal is not the right, but the question is, whose responsibility and responsibility are? Obviously, this man is a match referee, so on what basis did the match referee give this decision? When the mango fan is clearly watching the difference between the merit between Dubey and Rana, why couldn’t the match referee Jawagal Srinath see it? Why Srinath could not see that Dubey is a batsman-cum-all-rounder, so Rana is a bowler-cum-all-rounder. Certainly in the second innings, the match referee’s lapse gave India a “illegitimate benefit”.
Impact player became a replacement!
In fact, due to this mistake of the match referee, the replacement rule turned into an IPL impact player. The situation born has given the ICC a reason for peeping in the case as soon as possible. The rules are looking right once in their place, but if someone is guilty here, he is the match referee and former Indian cricketer Jawagal Srinath. Now it has to be seen what the ICC decides or how does this big omission of Shrinath take? By interfering, we mean that ICC further will ensure that such an incident does not happen again? Will the ICC explain in detail the word “Like-to-Like” in its rule, which would be better to do? If this happens, the issue of batting-all-rounder and bowling-all-rounder will end. Will the match referee be asked to be more transparent about this? Or if a match referee makes such a mistake, then what will be the provision of punishment for him? .. etc. Obviously this issue will reach the ICC Cricket Committee and a committee with veterans will definitely churn with seriousness.
(Tagstotranslate) Harshit Pradep Rana (T) England (T) England (T) India vs England 01/31/2025 inn01312025247154 (T) Cricket